BOURGEOIS COMMUNISM V

The left had a "master plan" they were convinced their candidate would win; blinded by their arrogance and their elitism, they failed to heed the clamor of the very downtrodden masses they so often speak about when demagoguery is necessary. They flirted so intensely with alien interests and values that they forgot what America was about; they moved so far to the left that they left America; and above all, in defiance of all logics they prioritized a mafioso agreement between Obama and the Clintons (in emulation of a feudal marriage arrangements) over all the warning signs as to the vulnerabilities of the crowned queen. We all know the result; they lost, and when we say they lost we mean they lost as to exclude any possibility of the other candidate winning. The left blew it, the left lost; that is the root of their hatred towards the current president; every time Donald J Trump appears on TV or makes a remark they are mercilessly reminded of their historic gaffe and they simply cannot accept it. How can you make a mistake if you are always right? How can this people be so stupid, so ignorant and so red necked to vote for "that man"?. They had it all worked out; after eight years of Obama yet eight more years of Hillary Clinton and the job would have been completed; religion against the wall, an attack to the jugular of the second amendment, total neutralization of the right in academia and in all campuses of America; gradual erosion of the semantics and the perception in order to sow doubt and confusion. They had realized the gay movement by itself would not delete our identity: the American people in its proverbial kindness and compassion had come to terms with the issue and defeated homophobia; thus, they had to shift to a higher gear: doubt, blurred lines, hesitation, vacillation; gays were not gay anymore; it was time to not know who we were; we had to feel male today and female tomorrow, the seed of uncertainty would undermine our identity until we were no longer able of knowing who we were. Whether Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton were conscious accomplices in this conspiracy remains to be seen. My personal opinion is that while Obama did not feel any regrets about "changing" America, Hillary was not too happy about departing from what she had known all her life, but she wanted the presidency so badly that she would not alienate the extremists that had taken her party hostage. Wittingly or unwittingly they had been chipping away at the facade of this luxurious high rise we call the USA.

The blonde mogul was an obstacle and since that fateful Tuesday night in November of 2016 they abandoned the coordinated strategy to engage in an all out civil war that continues to erode our nationality as we read these lines. But we are not alone; this is not an American conspiracy, the bourgeois communists are everywhere; enjoying a cup of coffee in the Parisian boulevards, sipping prosecco in Rome and marching down the streets of Madrid on Venezuela's dime. Their objectives are the same: instill guilt, doubt, hatred, confusion and hesitation. They need to guarantee that we don't fight back so that when we wake up their job is finished. The upsetting of the ethnic balance, the latinamericanization of the US and the spread of the Muslim religion throughout Europe; the Third World version of the Christian crusades. Why would rich people who can enjoy a wonderful life go into all those troubles?; because money is not enough; Soros and a handful of capitalist leeches want it all; they no longer want to share their privileges with a few chosen: they want to be the "only ones" ignoring the fact that once the hateful masses are put in motion the avalanche destroys everything and that they won't live to enjoy their victory. 

Before we end this series, let's point out some of the techniques used by this dangerous elite:

1- They manipulate history hyperbolising the evils of the right and humanizing the atrocities of the left.

2- They exercise a tacit monopoly on history; therefore, they quote events and phrases of the past at will to prove their points, but when we try to do the same they shrug our arguments off stating that we cannot live in the past.

3- They viciously dig any and all unpleasantries of the right but edulcorate and sugar coat their own.

4- They claim the throne of culture; theirs are the artists and the entertainers, the writers and the poets and those few who dare challenge them are ostracized and neutralized.

5- They carefully collect all evidences of "deviation" from the conventional norms of our society although they claim to be progressive and revolutionary; although from Kennedy to Clinton the left has engaged often in sexual debaucheries; they invariably assassinate the character of anyone who challenges their narratives; Clarence Thomas, Herman Cain and more recently Bill Cosby are just a few examples of the same racist plot: the black guy who raped the white lady or who sexually harassed a woman. Always blacks and sex; one would think it is a conservative, white narrative; instead this weapon is mostly wielded by the so called "progressives".

The list goes on and on, but the aforementioned points are some of the most common tactics used by such dangerous variant of the old communism; which leads us to my point in the first chapter: Gramci's theory of creating alliances with honest capitalists that would be kicked in the butt when the time was right.